Israel, which is not a signatory and has more than 100 hundred nuclear warheads (though will not acknowledge it), has been pressing for military action against Iran as a means of stopping them from getting close to developing nuclear power. Such a step would be the equivalent of throwing gasoline on an already intense fire in the region. It would be callous and irresponsible. President Obama, despite the prodding on the part of many Republicans and Democrats, has continued negotiations and this should be supported. To a great extent this is about trust building between nations.
Before you get too excited, here is where Obama got it wrong, and I mean really wrong. In addition to an unfocused military campaign against ISIL/ISIS and a refusal to insist that the Iraqi Shiite-dominated regime clean up its act and embrace the Sunni minority, it was revealed that Obama is permitting continued U.S. military action in Afghanistan, despite a pledge to the contrary. There is no end in sight to the war in Afghanistan. It should be more than clear that the regime in Kabul is quite corrupt and not serving as a force to unify the country. Therefore, the question is what is to be gained by continued U.S. involvement? Why one more year? Should it not be obvious that a dramatically different approach needs to be undertaken in order to bring about a resolution to the conflict?
When it comes to the Middle East and Central Asia, President Obama seems to be of two minds. On the one hand, he recognizes that war with Iran would be disastrous. He also remembers that he was elected to get the U.S. out of Iraq, and, for that matter Afghanistan. Yet he has been either unable or unwilling to articulate a foreign policy theory or narrative that ties the different pieces together. As a result, he slowly but surely submits to the pressure of the war hawks who seem to care little that the U.S. remains the greatest purveyor of violence on this planet.
About Post Author
