The triple tsunami of global capitalism that pounded socialist Cuba this month has spawned a fierce debate about the downside of detente with the United States. Artists, writers and intellectuals who believe deeply in Cuba’s opening to the world are questioning their government’s management of an onslaught of big-money pop culture.
On an island that prides itself on egalitarianism, sovereignty and its long record of outsize accomplishments in the arts, many are openly critiquing opaque deals with multinational corporations seeking picturesque backdrops for car chases and summer frocks.
Then came the arrival of the Adonia, the first U.S. cruise ship in Cuba in nearly 40 years. Around the world, television viewers watched prosperous-looking Americans greeted by trays of rum drinks and Afro-Cuban dancers in skimpy Cuban flag-patterned bathing suits. For many Cubans, it was a spectacle uniting the worst exotic stereotypes about their country with disrespect for a symbol of independence.
Within 24 hours, the world’s rich and famous were lounging on park benches on the majestic, colonial Prado boulevard as slender models showed off outfits by the French luxury label Chanel that seemed inspired by pre-revolutionary Cuba. The mostly foreign audience arrived in specially hired classic American cars. Havana residents had to watch from behind police lines more than a block away.
A year and a half after the U.S. and Cuba declared detente, and a month after President Barack Obama visited Havana, it seemed as if the world of global commerce and entertainment had finally landed on Cuba with full force.
Many Cubans were exuberant. Avid consumers of U.S. culture in pirated TV and films, they welcomed the sight of movie stars walking the streets of a country that often feels cut off from the outside world. Many said they were hopeful that the millions spent on the productions would improve life for those who haven’t yet benefited from the post-detente surge in tourism.
But people’s personal offense at being held far from the events began translating into skepticism about whether their country’s hot new status would help improve their lives.
“I love that the world is looking at us, that the world is fixing its eyes on Cuba, but up until now I don’t see that it’s really bringing real, concrete benefits,” said Alberto O’Reilly, a 22-year-old librarian who was kicked off a street corner by police as he tried to watch the Chanel show.
For some Cubans, the flashy spectacles recalled the pre-revolutionary days when wealthy Americans viewed Cuba as a sexy tropical playground, ignoring the problems of the people who lived on the island. Fidel Castro famously shut down the country’s casinos and most sordid nightclubs when he came to power.
“It’s very important that we don’t give the “Ugly American” reason to come back,” said Desiderio Navarro, a widely respected critic and editor. “We’re not in the 1930s or ’40s and we mustn’t repeat the errors of the past.”
The public backlash began the day after Chanel’s show, with a remarkable blog post by Sergio Gomez, the international editor of Granma, the Cuban Communist Party’s official newspaper.
Gomez, 28, took to the blogging website Medium with a lacerating post that called on Cuba’s leaders to better explain their dealings with the likes of Chanel and NBCUniversal, the entertainment giant that shot “Fast and Furious” in Havana.
“It would be hard to overturn a revolution, much less Cuba’s revolution, by filming of a Hollywood blockbuster, helicopter included, or by closing the Prado boulevard to show off the cruise collection of a famous French brand,” he wrote. “But the way in which these events are interpreted, in the context of a process of change that will define the destiny of 11 million people, can subvert the social consensus that the country has maintained for more than half a century.”
“There were many people on the Prado trying to see the show,” he wrote. “But even more in the stores trying to find basic goods with recently reduced prices, like chicken and cooking oil.”
Pogolotti was next. In an open letter in the state newspaper Juventud Rebelde, or Rebel Youth, she acknowledged that Cuba needs “commerce, investment and tourism in order to confront the economic difficulties that afflict us.”
“But the demands of reality can’t make us forget that we must, above all, fight for national sovereignty,” she wrote. “That means we must, in every case, set the rules of the game. It’s everyone’s responsibility to demand respect for the dignity of our citizens.”
Three days later, Juventud Rebelde published an unusually confrontational interview with Roberto Smith, the president of the government film institute that deals with foreign productions.
Saying “a singular debate is occurring about the filming of ‘Fast and Furious,'” interviewer Onaisys Fonticoba Gener asked Smith how much NBCUniversal was paying to film in Cuba and where the money was going. Smith deferred the first question and assured readers the money would go to support Cuban filmmakers.
Cuba’s official Union of Writers and Artists also complained that the cruise ship reception offered “a deplorable sight to those visiting our country for the first time.”
Still, Cuba doesn’t appear to be running out of chances to get it right.
Michael Bay, director of the “Transformers” movie series based on the popular 1980s robot toys, said on his blog this week that work on the fifth installment was about to begin.
“It’s been an amazing journey,” he wrote over a picture of a glowering computer-generated robot. “Transformers starts production this week in Cuba.”
Michael Weissenstein on Twitter: https://twitter.com/mweissenstein