When will our hair be enough?

In a recent turn of events, Barbers Hill High School in Texas finds itself embroiled in controversy once again, as a 17-year-old junior named Darryl has been placed on academic punishment due to alleged violations of the school’s hair and dress code regulations. Darryl’s suspension has ignited a firestorm of criticism, as it is perceived by many as an unjust application of the rules, particularly in light of the Crown Act that was enacted to protect individuals from discrimination based on their natural hair.

The crux of the issue revolves around Darryl’s hairstyle, which school authorities claim was not in compliance with the stipulated regulations. Specifically, his hair was deemed too long as it extended past his shoulders, a transgression that led to his in-school suspension for several weeks. Darryl’s mother, Darresha George, took to social media to share images of her son’s hair and voiced her dissatisfaction with the punishment, asserting that it was entirely unnecessary given the protection afforded by the Crown Act. This landmark legislation prohibits school district dress codes from discriminating against “protective hairstyles,” including braids and locs, which are frequently worn by individuals of African descent.

This incident is not the first time that Barbers Hill High School has been thrust into the national spotlight for alleged discrimination against Black students’ hairstyles. Just last year, a similar situation unfolded when another Black student, Deandre Arnold, found himself facing disciplinary action due to his hair.

Prominent activists have fervently condemned the school’s actions, contending that the punitive measures taken against students for their “Black hair” contribute to a climate of white supremacy and systemic discrimination. Many argue that Darryl’s suspension should be promptly rescinded. Moreover, they are demanding that the federal government consider withdrawing its funding from the school district if such incidents persist.

Attorney Allie Booker weighed in on the matter, emphasizing that the school’s dress code, as long as it adheres to basic standards such as not allowing hair below the lobes, hiding the eyes, or extending to the nape of the neck or collar, should not be used to discriminate against students with protective hairstyles, including locs.

Despite the uproar surrounding this incident, Barbers Hill High School has yet to officially address the matter, leaving the community and activists in search of answers.

This situation underscores the deeply ingrained historical context of discrimination against Black individuals and their natural hair. For generations, Black people have faced systemic bias and racial stereotypes related to their hair. The struggle for the acceptance and celebration of Black hair as a crucial aspect of identity continues to this day, with the Crown Act representing a significant step toward rectifying these historical injustices.

Darryl’s suspension at Barbers Hill High School serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges Black individuals face in their quest for equal treatment and respect for their natural hair. The incident has ignited a passionate response from activists, who are determined to ensure that the Crown Act is upheld and that schools like Barbers Hill High do not perpetuate discriminatory practices rooted in the historical context of Black hair discrimination.

About Post Author


From the Web

Skip to content