UNSPORTSMANLIKE CONDUCT: Was Brett Favre benefiting from government funds?

Hear ye, hear ye, the sports world court of mo­rality is now in session. The most honorable Au­brey Bruce residing… oops, Charlie Chan meant to say, “presiding.”

On April 14, 2022, www. forbes.com posted an ar­ticle written by Marisa Dellatto titled: “Brett Fa­vre Scandal: Alleged $8 Million Welfare Scam, Ex­plained.” Part of the article read: “Former Green Bay Packers Quarterback Hall of Famer Brett Favre has been accused of using his ‘special access’ to former Mississippi Gov. Phil Bry­ant and other officials in his home state in order to influence roughly $8 mil­lion in welfare payments for himself, pharmaceu­tical company Prevacus, and a volleyball court for the University of South­ern Mississippi, according to an expose published last week Mississippi To­day—though Favre has not been charged crim­inally or accused of a crime. Between 2016 and 2018, the nonprofit Mis­sissippi Community Ed­ucation Center doled out $5 million—allegedly at Favre’s request—to the University of Southern Mississippi, where Favre attended and where his daughter also attended and played volleyball, to pay for a new volleyball court, according to Missis­sippi Today; the nonprofit also paid him $1.1 mil­lion to promote a program called Families First.”

Another report on the alleged violations posted on newsweek.com stated that: “The U.S. Census has stated that Mississip­pi has the highest rate of poverty in the U.S. One in five people live with it, which includes 28 percent of children in the state. Favre’s alleged involve­ment was that he received $1.1 million, intended for welfare recipients, in exchange for the former Packers star making a number of speeches and appearances.”

Families First, hmm, I guess that means Brett Favre and his family.

If these reports are true, then Brett Favre’s gold jacket should be ex­changed for a straitjack­et if he thinks for one minute that any rational or sane human being be­lieves that he is not at least partially responsi­ble for illegally pocketing government funds. Aren’t these the same folks that incessantly preach “wel­fare reform” and relent­lessly rant about “every­one pulling themselves up by their bootstraps?” It seems funds that were earmarked for those who are less fortunate actually pulled up the bootstraps of Brett Favre. Favre proudly hails from “Fort Mississippi,” a state that remains a proud bastion of the Confederacy. This is a place where many peo­ple guard and continue to preserve the anti-emanci­pation principles of slav­ery and remain staunch believers that the South won the Civil War. This is a place where almost one-third of the population are children who have a prob­lem visualizing where their next meal may be coming from or whether they will have a safe place to sleep at night. Yet it is alleged that Favre misdi­rected public funds meant for the wellness of these same children; to honor his child by building her a volleyball court.

The Green Bay Packers have been mostly silent regarding the matter. However, recently one member of the team dared to call out two legendary politicians for so-called questionable behavior while fulfilling their du­ties. Jordan Zigler re­cently posted an article on gridironheroics.com. “Democrat Nancy Pelosi Called Out By Packers Star For Curious Stock Trades Connected To Gov­ernment Projects” was the headline. Zigler posted the following: “Green Bay Packers offensive lineman David Bakhtiari recently put Democratic Speaker Emeritus Nancy Pelosi on blast about a curious trade that was brought to the public’s attention. The star Packers player has a history of calling out pol­iticians who make profits in the stock market while in office.”

This was not the only violation that Bakhtiari, the Packers’ “senatorial policeman,” profiled. The article continued: “Per Wisconsin Sports Heroics, last year, Bakhtiari used his X platform to high­light a trade made by the late Senator Dianne Fein­stein, whose net worth grew to over $200 million during her 30-year career in public office. Bakh­tiari’s friend and former Packers teammate, Aaron Rodgers, supported Bakh­tiari for pointing out Fein­stein’s trading history.”

It took Senator Diane Feinstein more than 30 years to accumulate ap­proximately $200 million. Also, Nancy Pelosi, the former Speaker of the House, may or may not have benefited financially by allegedly connecting a few government projects to select stock purchas­es. However, Mrs. Pelosi has been responsible for billions of dollars in gov­ernment funding that have benefited all racial, gender, and age groups in her home state of Cal­ifornia; she has truly been “Family First.” Hey folks, Brett Favre’s only loyalty was to his pockets and his daughter’s love of volley­ball. Mrs. Pelosi may be of Italian lineage but to my knowledge, she has never been accused or convicted of diverting public funds for the construction of Bocci ball courts.

Why was most of the cri­tique from David Bakh­tiari aimed at the late Senator Diane Feinstein, who died on September 29, 2023, at the age of 90? For at least six months before her death, Senator Feinstein was feeble and barely cognizant enough to defend herself. It is my opinion that David Bakh­tiari is a right-wing pred­ator. It is also my opinion that Brett Favre was of sound mind when he com­mitted the alleged viola­tions that he is accused of took place. Where is the “fine-tooth comb” criticism of David Bakhtiari and Aaron Rodgers regarding the fiscal shenanigans of the “robbing in the hood” Brett Favre? According to an article posted on www.nickiswift.com ti­tled: “Brett Favre’s Shady Side,” the article revealed the following: “While playing for the Packers, Favre reportedly kept hearing then-coach Mike Holmgren toss around the term ‘nickel defense.’ He finally mustered up the courage to ask team­mate Ty Detmer what the heck a nickel defense was. ‘So I said, ‘Ty, I gotta ask you a question … What’s a nickel defense?’ Favre recalled. ‘He gets real qui­et. He says, ‘Are you seri­ous?’ Once enlightened by Detmer’s football wisdom, Favre says he responded with, ‘That’s it? Who gives a s__t?’”

Was Brett Favre smart enough to know right from wrong? If not, is that the reason that he present­ed a defense that wasn’t worth a “plug nickel” to the prosecutors?

 

 

About Post Author

Comments

From the Web

Skip to content